Notice how Oakhame Adversary says it costs less if "your opponent" controls a green permanent, rather than "an opponent"? It implies you'll only ever have one opponent... that's some 1994 wording right there.
Sunday, February 2, 2020
Ripples of the Past
This is something I just noticed, and I haven't seen any indication online of people talking about this, so I think I may have discovered a very minor and particular typo that slipped through the cracks here.
Notice how Oakhame Adversary says it costs less if "your opponent" controls a green permanent, rather than "an opponent"? It implies you'll only ever have one opponent... that's some 1994 wording right there.
Notice how Oakhame Adversary says it costs less if "your opponent" controls a green permanent, rather than "an opponent"? It implies you'll only ever have one opponent... that's some 1994 wording right there.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)